Naval fighting caused fog and mist – which
should have been expected.

Posted: May 12th, 2017

This post is about meteorology, respectively about the impact of the sea on the weather during a major clash of two naval fleets in the North Sea, and whether the Admirals were well enough trained for such an event. They were not! The battle itself was fought late in the day of May 31st, 1916. About 250 naval ships and 100.000 sailors took part.

Soon the visibility was appalling, induced by a combination of North Sea fog, lingering cordite fumes and chemical smoke screens. Often, only two ships could be seen at any moment. None of the parties did foresee it. Neither party had prepared for it. None of the ship-leaders had been meteorologically trained for this situation thus missed the opportunity to handle poor visibility, and to turn it into an advantage.

Battle of Jutland on the day of Wednesday, 31st of May 1916






Sketch of Battle of Jutland at 6:30pm on 31st of May 1916

Ships during Battle of Jutland

Major Theatre of Jutland Battle on 31st of May 1916

The two Admirals John Jellicoe and Reinhard Scheer should have known, that a huge armada of warships at the entrance of the Skagerrak in early summer would inevitably cause severe visibility problems, due to the temperature structure of the sea. Before explaining this in more detail, a brief instruction to the sea battle itself.  

Just fought over a few hours on May 31 1916 (starting about 02 p.m. plus 15 hours), the Battle of Jutland was the only major battle of First World War (WWI) fought at sea, but became known as perhaps the largest surface battle in naval history due to the numbers of battleships and battlecruisers engaged. Although the battle itself produced no winner, it nevertheless changed the course of WWI, because the Imperial German High Sea Fleet, was never been seen  at sea again.

German Imperial High Sea Float at war sea at the Battle of Jutland on 31st of May Map of Battle of Jutland from 31st of May 1916 Ships during war at the Battle of Jutland

The battle began ignominiously with the destruction of two British battlecruisers, Indefatigable and Queen Mary. Of the HMS Indefatigable crew of 1,019, only two survived; 1,266 crewmen of HMS Queen Mary were lost; eighteen survivors were picked up by several GB and GER destroyers.  At the beginning of the battle the firing range was between 10,000 and 18,000 yards (about 9-16 km). That applied only for a short time. Soon visibility changed on a wide range and at all battle areas. Occasionally ships in the West of the major scene could be better targeted (fired at) than those more easterly of the fighting center. Those vessels were more hidden in smoke, dust, mist and fog.  This difficult fighting condition was clearly expressed by the First Lord of the Admiralty John Jellicoe:
                      “The whole situation was so difficult to grasp, as I had no real idea of what
                     was going on and we could hardly see anything except the flashes of guns,
                     shells falling, ships blowing up, and an occasional glimpse of an Enemy vessel.” 
This situation continued with fog and mist patches until the navies separated in the early morning hours on June 1st, 1916.

Meanwhile 101 years have passed and presumably many 100 books and several 1000 analysis and articles been written. On the other hand the anthropogenic weather-making aspect by churning the sea with screw driven vessels, many thousand shells and several sinking ships that contributed significantly towards miserable fighting conditions, has never received any attention. During the last 101 years meteorology has not undertaken any attempt to analyzes, whether the navies had been insufficiently trained to expect and handle such a situation. After 101 the navies are still not trained to prepare and handle such situation today.  Until now meteorology has still not recognized that even brief activities at sea, as the Battle of Jutland, may show a significant impact on weather, and over a longer period on the ‘climate’. The Battle of Jutland would have been an excellent event to study the correlation. Here is our assessment:

Climate weather situation from month May of Battle of Jutland Depth charges exploding during World War I Climate weather situation from month June of Battle of Jutland

The North Sea at 56°42 North and 5°52 East is about 250 km off the shore of Jutland, and at the South/West entrance to the Skagerrak. The area of the major engagement in the afternoon of Mai 31st exceeded 100 km in diameter. The water depth is about 50-70 meter and the water temperature in May between 6 to 8°C in June between 7 to 12°C (Fig. 8 and 10). The upper sea surface layer of several meters was certainly a few degrees warmer. Before the major fighting started the weather was fine, a light breeze, calm sea, and the visibility was good. That change quickly dramatically, with greatest variations.

That should not come as surprise. Actually the North Sea water is still cold. Only a thin surface layer is significant warmer than the lower water body. The numerous battle ships had a drought of 10 meter and a speed of close to 50 km/h. Instantly the sea water structure changed. The warm surface layer was plugged under and replaced by colder water. Instantly the air temperature cooled down as well supporting a downgrading of the visibility. There are many reports from eyewitnesses available. A Turret Officer of HMS “Malaya” noted for the time 05:40 p.m. this:

Until about 5.40 the enemy’s firing continued to be very brisk, and to fall all around us. The visibility for us had been getting steadily worse; in fact ever since 5.15 we had rarely been able to see … (cont.)

This problem remained. The sea was flat calm but the sight hazy. Although the two armada sailed on a crossing line southwards during the night only random fighting occurred.  Sea fog often only 10 to 20 meters high prevented more clashes. After daybreak on June 1st, the High Fleet was in the east of The Royal Navy, and thus on the safe side. The Battle of Jutland was history.

The lessons the battle could taught meteorology and naval commanders with regard to weather making have not been investigated and learned yet. The message is:

Those who do not understand anthropogenic weather making
can hardly explain climatic changes !

More concerning WWI & Weather/Climate:

[1]   Warming before Cooling – 1918 to 1939; The trace to the First World War;
Europe Weather–Influence by WWI

This post hopefully encourages investigation in man-made weather aspect of the Jutland Battle now. Your input is welcome!

36 hours that won the war at the Battle of Jutland Destroyers generating a smoke across the sea at the Battle of Jutland How the fleets compare on the Battle of Jutland
Battlecruiser action Destroyers generating a smoke during the Battle of Jutland The main engagement during the Battle of Jutland




This article has 33 comments

  1. I do not know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else encountering problems with your site.

    It seems like some of the text within your posts are
    running off the screen. Can somebody else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them too?
    This may be a problem with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously.

    Appreciate it

  2. Hey there! Would you mind if I share your blog
    with my twitter group? There’s a lot of folks that I think
    would really appreciate your content. Please let me know.

  3. Hello friends, how is all, and what you desire to say on the topic of this article, in my view its really awesome
    in support of me.

  4. You actually make it appear really easy along with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something that
    I believe I might by no means understand. It kind of feels too complicated and extremely extensive for me.

    I am looking forward for your next put up,
    I’ll attempt to get the dangle of it!

  5. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get setup?
    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?

    I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100% sure.
    Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Many thanks

  6. I think this is one of the most significant information for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. But want to
    remark on some general things, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really great
    : D. Good job, cheers

  7. Hello there! I simply wish to offer you a big thumbs up for your great information you’ve got here
    on this post. I’ll be returning to your website for more soon.

  8. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog
    and wished to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.

    In any case I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  9. My family always say that I am wasting my time here at
    web, except I know I am getting know-how daily by reading thes pleasant

  10. It’s actually very difficult in this busy life
    to listen news on Television, thus I only use internet for that purpose, and
    obtain the most up-to-date information.

  11. My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find most of your post’s to
    be just what I’m looking for. can you offer guest writers to write content in your case?

    I wouldn’t mind producing a post or elaborating on a number of the
    subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome weblog!

  12. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find
    this topic to be really something that I think I would never understand.

    It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the
    hang of it!

  13. I know this web page presents quality based posts and other data,
    is there any other web site which gives such stuff in quality?

  14. Excellent post. Keep posting such kind of information on your blog.
    Im really impressed by it.[X-N-E-W-L-I-N-S-P-I-N-X]Hey there, You’ve
    done an excellent job. I’ll definitely digg it and
    individually suggest to my friends. I am sure they’ll be
    benefited from this website.

  15. Superb post however , I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject?
    I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further.
    Many thanks!

  16. Definitely consider that that you said. Your favourite reason seemed to be at the internet the easiest factor to remember of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked even as other folks think about
    concerns that they plainly do not understand about. You
    controlled to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects ,
    other folks can take a signal. Will probably be back to
    get more. Thanks!

  17. Wе’re a bunch of volunteers and оpening a brand new scheme іn our community.
    Your web site offered us wіth valuable info to wоrk on. Үoս’ve performed an impressive task ɑnd οur whole community will probаbly
    be thankful to you.

  18. I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i’m glad
    reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really nice :
    D. Good job, cheers

  19. you are truly a excellent webmaster. The site loading pace is incredible.
    It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick.
    Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you’ve done a excellent activity
    on this matter!

  20. Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us you actually realize what you are talking about!
    Bookmarked. Kindly additionally visit my site =). We can have a link trade agreement between us

  21. I needed to thank you for this excellent read!! I absolutely loved every little bit of it.

    I’ve got you saved as a favorite to check out new stuff you post…

  22. Ahaa, its nice conversation on the topic of this piece of writing here at this website,
    I have read all that, so at this time me also commenting here.

  23. Your style is unique in comparison to other folks I
    have read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting
    when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll just bookmark this web site.

  24. Excellent web site. Lots of useful info here. I’m sending
    it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious.

  25. It’s very trouble-free to find out any matter on web as compared to books,
    as I found this piece of writing at this web site.

  26. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how could
    i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal.
    I have been tiny bit familiar of this your broadcast
    offered vibrant clear idea

  27. Pingback: Jutland

Leave a Reply to Ronald Brickle Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eleven − 9 =